◇ 0xNull

← Search the archive · Browse this month

John McAfee · archived post

@justavoice2018 Indeed

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation

Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.

My technoligy Architects came up with this vision of a perpetual waterfall. Unlimited power for the 21st Century: https://t.co/I6N3u0iuDF

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

636 likes · 67 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @antiprowhatever

@antiprowhatever Ty

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Asteroid_please

@Asteroid_please Word!!

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DudeManSir

@DudeManSir Word!!

23 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @IntrepidCrypto

@IntrepidCrypto Yes.

24 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @paulgabella

@paulgabella Yes. It is.

6 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @heroinforsale

@heroinforsale :)

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Navier_Tokes

@Navier_Tokes Yes. He did.

9 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Whackdd

@WHACKDtoken We have a prototype generating 200,000 watts already.

4 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Whackdd

@WHACKDtoken Yes!!

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @EnglishroseTJ

@Tammyj1990 The water is used for generating electricity. Not for drinking. You should care less how dirty the water is. Just sayin.

8 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @moibro9

@moibro9 No

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @moibro9

@moibro9 Don't need an upstream or downstream for this architecture. Up/down have no meaning here.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @moibro9

@moibro9 Unfuckinglikely

49 likes · 3 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @satoshixrpoto

@mradriantanta Word

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@CryptoTk421 Water Is Possibly Better.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Whackdd

@WHACKDtoken It consumes none. But produces 385 kilowatts.

3 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @herauthon

@herauthon Yes

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @officialmcafee

Our prototype is generating 427,000 Kilowatts currently. This is a real world solution people. Ignore naysayers Who know nothing of art And less of technology. I have the solution. For sale for: 271,620 EU.

135 likes · 5 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @21noncents21

@21noncents21 I did

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗