◇ 0xNull

← Search the archive · Browse this month

John McAfee · archived post

Reply to @CFGX_20T

@CFGX_20T No. It is a statistically significant sample size.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation

Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.

Reply to @GammGubbe

@GammGubbe Should people not be made aware of that when they chose numbers:)

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @twoduckonehorse

@twoduckonehorse Not trolling. Try it with past winners of every lottery in the country. And you are wrong. 73 is a good sample size for random numbers. Ask any statistician.

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @mrskeena

@mrskeena Bullshit! Try it with past winners of every lottery in the country. You will get exactly this same ratio.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@OmniformInt Test it by looking at past numbers yourself. Have you no fucking curiosity? Jesus fucking Christ!!!!!

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @pookyswags

@pookyswags :)

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @car_25

@car_25 Why don't you just fucking test it out?? You can get lists of winning lottery numbers in the web. Jesus fucking Christ. You would rather presume than just see for yourself??? What the fuck is wrong with people????

3 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗