◇ 0xNull

← Search the archive · Browse this month

John McAfee · archived post

Reply to @MarkEglinton

@MarkEglinton Lol! Top is cases, bottom is deaths

10 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation

Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.

Herd immunity is math, not medicine. By doing nothing at the beginning, letting the virus free, the deaths front load and diminish quickly to next to nothing. By isolating the population, the deaths drag out and are, in the end, more. L - Sweden R - U.S. Sweden was right. https://t.co/NzriDYBzrl

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

1,632 likes · 490 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @HahTse

@HahTse Herd immunity is not dependent on individual cases. Research the mathematics please. There will akwats be a tiny number of infections.

45 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @BeauSolWaits

@BeauSolWaits Isn't it?

9 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ivan_danko99

@ivan_danko99 Maybe. But the math is among the most complex of all types of analyses. I believe in numbers, not opinions. Look at the graphs.

39 likes · 3 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@Iberianite :)

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @FudgeTosser

@PolitixFix Maybe I will too. But facts are facts.

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ema456782

@preppe99 Numbers are ridiculous.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Neckbard1

@Neckbard1 The "Mask Lobby". Masks don't protect you - they protect others.

5 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗