@pacosteles Where are your facts? That's all that I'm asking. Not a single double blind study ANYWHERE has shown that these machines save lives rather than kill 9 out of 10 people. Please ... this is so important for you to understand if you hope to understand what is going on.
← Search the archive · Browse this month
John McAfee · archived post
Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation
Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.
Ventilators No studies showing that these machines save 1 out of 10 people rather than kill 9 out of 10. All you have is the assumption that they save one out of ten ... ... And the fact that 9 out of 10 die. Assumptions vs facts. What's happened to science my friends?
@fookwit_ :)
@tradermamoti If they were alive when placed on the macines then they were breathing. Please my friend, do not buy into the nonsense they are propagating, even if they believe it themselves. Our future depends on it.
@yuribombs They do not. They never did. The death rate for anyone placed in a respirator for any condition is no different.
@tradermamoti If they were alive when they were placed on the ventilator then they were still breathing. A doctor decided the machines would help them. These are the facts. 9 out of 10 died who were placed on the machines. Why are you ignoring simple facts?
@yuribombs Is it? How many assumptions did you just make to arrive at your conclusion implying that 9 people were not killed to help your hypothetical patient. No study EVER has shown that these machines help people. Why is this so hard to understand?
@TopHatofEvil @pacosteles Where is the data that supports that? Not a single study has ever been done that says these machines save lives. We only know that 9 out of 10 die on them. Please .... Understand this or you will never understand what is going on around you now.