John McAfee · archived post

@DCA_Cryptoz Totally incorrect my friend. All deaths from respiratory infections are tested. Less than 1% of the general population has been tested. You must multiply the reported infections by at least 100, so you must divide the death rate by at least 100.

Something is terribly wrong with the way Covid-19 deaths are being reported!!!! https://t.co/8L5ETdT0me

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

@Besterleo Word

@journopixs Yes

@Goldnsilica :)

@dpakman Covid-19 is not growing exponentially, neither was it before the lockdown.

@cryptoplisken YES!!!!! It's insane

@rustydavis4444 @cryptoplisken More than typical??? What does that even mean?

@shortblockstack Yes. Absolutely. At least in the Northern hemisphere where the problem currently is.

@AleazimAlhut Ty

@dat_realtruth All deaths from any respiratory problem are tested. The death rate is certainly no more than reported.

@dat_realtruth All deaths from respiratory problems are tested. Absolutely. All infections are not But we're talking deaths here.

@r_duke71 Deaths???? Impossible. All deaths from respiratory problems are tested. Infections? Absolutely under reported, but we are talking about deaths.

@DustinGoetz Ok. So that makes the number of actual deaths from Covid-19 even less.

@cooop23 No one is immune.

@PetriPilar Thank you Petri.

@FPiednoel Thank you.

@C0VlD_I9 I just did.

@pagebike Worpd

@CryptoShill5 Yes

@npl77 YES!!!!!

@mrdevdotnet Yes!!! By edict of the CDC!!!!!!

@Cryptui2 :)

@JoeCrypto7 Ty

@ShaunWLockwood @Simple_Trends Yep.

@DCA_Cryptoz In any case, what does the death rate matter if it does not change the absolute number of deaths?

@quidproquo4show I am with the true program.

@cryptoplisken Word!

@YOjawnZiLLA @dpakman Show me.

@ByronKruger @dpakman True

@poorboy_1974 I am running. https://t.co/KV2WtJjmgU

@Shaneredmond13 Lmfao