◇ 0xNull

← Search the archive · Browse this month

John McAfee · archived post

Reply to @MirakhorHassan

@MirakhorHassan :)

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation

Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.

Been consulting with a fundamentalist religious group that wants to use the Blockchain to ensure that church members are abiding by the faith (for real). My concern: Those who have not embraced the Blockchain might be denied everlasting salvation. Am I doing the right thing?

429 likes · 27 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @psyxke

@psyxke Yes. But Sin is a powerful enemy, and when that enemy is armed with the Blockchain, those who believe themselves to be non-sinners might be unpleasantly surprised when the absolute truth of every instant of their existence is suddenly revealed.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ceneblock

@ceneblock A pop paycheck is a paycheck

8 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @officialmcafee

They first wanted to put Church members on the Blockchain and then extrapolate backwards to discover sins from their distant past. Smelling money, and eager to please, I proposed a reverse-fork simulation using 3rd order partial differential equations. Too costly. Said no.

111 likes · 7 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@Stack_O_Meter We love you too Stack.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@DyfetWorldie "Their" own. A German company created a Blockchain simulation of the major religions today and was shocked to discover there are actually three Gods that rotate duty so frequently that the changeovers are merely a blur in human-time.

8 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Newus071

@Newus071 Possibly. Soon, using the Blockchain, we will know for sure. I'm waiting to see.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @fibonaccicap

@fibonaccicap You decide. You are living in your reality. I, nor anyone else, can experience what you experience every moment of your life.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @thebogdanoff

@thebogdanoff Nonsense. It's math with reality. If we implemented my proposal and were able to dig up every act of a person's past life, all the way to their birth, those would simply be acts. The religious may call those acts "sins". But the naming does not in ny way diminish the reality.

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @oilfielder1

@oilfielder1 @DyfetWorldie :)

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @nsfwphd

@nsfwphd True

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @thebogdanoff

@thebogdanoff Won't matter. The beauty of the Blockchain is that if those who know you are on it, then you are on it. You can't escape dude. We're going to all know, a few years from now, the first time you masturbated and what you were thinking about while doing it.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @robdebrus

@robdebrus Let's let the Blockchain decide.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @campdavidtraing

@campdavidtraing WORD!!!!!!!!!!!! An unfortunate side effect of the Blockchain is that it will quickly determine the truths and falsehoods within religions and their histories and beliefs.

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @sonofnels

@sonofnels Wrong. Ever hear of negative numbers and how mathematics uses them? In any and all equations, TIME (t) can assume a negative quality without disturbing the coherence of the equation. Thus: -(t) simply is time in reverse. Took the development of the Blockchain to make it real.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @florindoc2003

@florindoc2003 Possibly. But with the Blockchain we will have a telescope into the past -- to see, for example, the first time you masturbated; when you told your first lie and what it was; your first sexual communion with another; what you thought about your second grade teacher -- everthing.

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗