← Search the archive · Browse this month

John McAfee · archived post

2019-10-08 · 13:01 UTCReply to @leon_texas

@leon_texas Yes. And they've tasted my balls before. What's your point? :)

17 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation

Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.

2019-10-08 · 12:56 UTCPost

.McAfeedex.com needs AML? No. It's a tool. To police it for money launderers you would have to police and monitor everyone. Is being monitored and controlled freedom? On a second note: who do money launderers hurt? The Government. Policeman? Not in my job description.

243 likes · 37 reposts at capture Original source ↗

2019-10-08 · 13:00 UTCReply to @Eljaboom

@Eljaboom Lmfao

9 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

2019-10-08 · 13:02 UTCPost

@daytimemystic Ty

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

2019-10-08 · 13:32 UTCReply to @tmcrypto1

@tmcrypto1 @leon_texas Lol

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

2019-10-08 · 13:32 UTCReply to @bharathrao

@bharathrao There you go then

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

2019-10-08 · 13:34 UTCReply to @ProfFaustus

@cachehash As you wish. But I will not sacrifice individual freedom for simple security.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗