@weallbepippin Lol
← Search the archive · Browse this month
John McAfee · archived post
Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation
Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.
We're busy tokenizing rare art pieces: The painting that we're tokenizing next month is a Picasso. Frankly, his work bewilders me. Most of the breasts in his paintings have no nipples. What's up with that? https://t.co/1emqVX8H3H
@HiFiWhiPhi I see . . . . . . Not.
@rs_designs02 @AndrewK14517145 Is a Picasso fishy? It is a real asset. Tokenization gives a person partial ownership. Only 20 or 30 people will have tokens. How do you redeem General Motors stock for a piece of GM company owned real estate. You cannot. Expand your horizons my friend.
@Jackcrz0800 It is a beautiful concept.
@rs_designs02 Can you redeem stock in Apple for a Mac or for a piece of Apple owned real estate? You cannot. Does it matter? Fuck no. You still own a piece if the company that can never be redeemed and you can sell it at any time.
@rs_designs02 There is no fucking third party. There is only the Blockchain and smart contracts. The painting sits in a fucking vault until the consensus says release it.
@rs_designs02 Good God man!!!!! If you want a risk free existence lock yourself in a closet and pay others to feed you through a slit. Do you think owners of physical rare artwork actually fucking display them??? No!! They rely on a third party to store and secure them and display a copy.
@zatoitchiban Ty
@AlannaMarieS Small ones though. The kind that look like they may scar you if you touched them.
@Cashconnector Listen . . . . Please. The Blockchain will never get rid of theft, greed, hostility, war, revenge, anger, jealousy and all the rest that makes living such a monumental risk. If you possessed 100% of the physical painting you would ask the same fucking question.
@CheetahCrypto @Cashconnector Yes. A high quality digital image.
@CheetahCrypto @Cashconnector No.