@johnpaulcurtin @jpierini Utter nonsense!!
← Search the archive · Browse this month
John McAfee · archived post
Other archived McAfee posts in this conversation
Up to 100 posts; this is not necessarily the complete thread or the other participants’ replies.
Youtube, Facebook and Apple jointly shut down Alex Jones Today. I don't mirror Alex's beliefs, but he has the right to speak them. This video was not removed since I copied it to my channel. I dont side with him. But I will fight for him. For free speech!! https://t.co/yOcxzO0T5D
@Manager_Josh With great power, such as the power wielded by Youtube, Apple and Facebook, comes great responsibility. The reach of these companies is enormous. To pretend that they do not, jointly, control public opinion is absurd. They have a responsibility to be impartial.
@CaloriesProper Clarence Darrow.
@BeerWhizzer I do not have the reach or responsibility of Twitter. I run a page with an obvious and public bias. I do not pretent to be an open platform. Those who disagree with me I block because I have no time to waste on them. My bias is clear and open.
@realmcwethy Yes. Very clever of you.
@orderstudiosllc Are they not the Government?? Don't you find it strange that all three simultaneously cut him off?? I certainly do. It seems to me to be plain validation of his conspiracy theories. Or maybe you have a different explaination.
@MattyBrand As you wish. I just think it's strange that all three companies chose the exact same day to can him. Its statistically improbable to the extreme. Alex kept insisting that all three were branches of the US Government. Is that such an outrageous assumption?
@Pizookie1 I have a highly publicised bias. I dont pretend to be impartial.
@BeerWhizzer It is the truth. Pure and simple.
@filosofunk @CaloriesProper Yes.
@Pizookie1 No sir, I do not. If these three companies will admit to having a political and social bias, as I did, I would have no problem. It is their pretense if impartiality that offends me.
@CryptoBullT Are they private? Please Gid, look at the facts.
@Tony_Purc False statement of facts????? Who is the arbiter to declare a fact either false or true? We know that history is written by the conquerors. Where is the truth in that? If the majority gets to decide what is true, then we have reached desperate straits.
@CryptoOZI Ty
@SteveO_in_AZ Indeed
@McclaneCrypto Maybe you dont understand what a "private company" versus a company "controlled by our Government" really means. Wake the fuck up. How likely is it that all three companies chose the same day?? Get fucking real!
@DPhilphil I will be.
@SellHomesBuyBTC Really? You are assuming that these are in fact private companies. If so, how come all three chose the same time to dump Alex? Do you see nothing strange in that? If you don't, then, please, continue on in your dream world.
@wayajol @hackerfantastic How fo you define a falsehood? Wise people spend lifetimes trying to find truth without success. What is your secret to identifying a falsehood?
@SunDazedRentals Ty
@EricVerney Yes, they are.
@EconomicGeek13 Agreed
@jpierini How do you define hate speech? Give me an example if hate speech actually spoken by Alex.
@marrrr_oh @Pizookie1 No
@Pizookie1 @marrrr_oh But not left leaning. I believe everyone must be responsible for themselves.
@Tony_Purc Am I? Isn't the acceptance of the impossibility of finding "truth" the beginning of true discourse? Only when we see the same reality can we possibly communicate. Does it matter what that reality is?
@GemCrypto Yes. We do
@softreeds If you believe these companies are private, then you need to look closer.
@Legaleagle26 If these three Social media giants are not somehow linked to our Government then how is it possible that all three chose the exact same day, within hours of each other, to ban Alex? How can you not see the implications of this? It is either Gov't or conspiricy. You choose.
@MorningStarXA @Legaleagle26 How can you ignore obvious corruption??? This attitude is why this country is in the mess that it's in.
@jatilfrihet1 @Legaleagle26 Word
@Thingamajig88 @Legaleagle26 Ty
@RapidProtoTripe @Legaleagle26 Its legally called conspiring.
@James_LoveAfter @Legaleagle26 Nit legally.
@Joel_Ainsworth @Legaleagle26 Then they are involved in conspiring against Alex Jones. Penalty: ten to twenty in Federal prison.
@jmommi @Legaleagle26 Then they conspired. Ten to twenty in Federsl prisin.
@mikel45365 @Legaleagle26 Ten to twenty in Feder prison if they conspired against Akex Jones.
@henry_young @Legaleagle26 Fully agreed. Cencorsjio is then impossible.
@Legaleagle26 Co-ordination to remove content is called conspiring, no matter how you look at it. Such conspiracies bring up to twenty years in Federal prison if proven.
@user14201 @Legaleagle26 And you dont understand that coordinated removal of content is called conspiring. Such conspiracies bring up to twenty years in Federal prison for the conspiritors.
@intmanomystery1 @Legaleagle26 Yes, they do
@eisstl @Legaleagle26 Hiw about that.
@KuwabaraCrypto @Legaleagle26 A coordinated removal of content is legally called conspiring. If these companies did indeed conspire, then the directors could face up to 20 years in Federal prison.
@TAC_HAMMER @Legaleagle26 I like fun times.
@_maKING_market @Legaleagle26 Then they acted jointly outside of the government. This is called conspiring. The directors of all three companies could face up to twenty years in Federal prison.