◇ 0xNull

All years / 2018

John McAfee · August 2018

1,910 archived posts · page 5 of 20. Oldest first.

Reply to @softreeds

@softreeds If you believe these companies are private, then you need to look closer.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Legaleagle26

@Legaleagle26 If these three Social media giants are not somehow linked to our Government then how is it possible that all three chose the exact same day, within hours of each other, to ban Alex? How can you not see the implications of this? It is either Gov't or conspiricy. You choose.

274 likes · 82 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @MorningStarXA

@MorningStarXA @Legaleagle26 How can you ignore obvious corruption??? This attitude is why this country is in the mess that it's in.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Monday morning on the way to Lexington TN. Where, believe it or not, I agreed to speak to the Rotary Club about cryptocurrencies, which I agreed to months ago. I meet my commitments, irrespective of cost. https://t.co/qg2N83BV5w

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

228 likes · 20 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @flyinghendrix

@flyinghendrix I agreed to it months ago. We moved to a different state in the interim. But I committed. So we are going to speak.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @joeydiblasi

@joeydiblasi Nah

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Ohsoyoural

@YungBundy1 Ty

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @buyinthedip

@buyinthedip Thanks

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @rakesh_maurya83

@rakesh_maurya83 I have no idea. The bank manager in Lexington asked me to speak. I said "yes".

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@krysko33 Is it? No one tells me these things.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @drakepreston

@drakepreston Ty

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@MindStateCrypto Ty

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @flyinghendrix

@flyinghendrix No sir.

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @joeydiblasi

@joeydiblasi Lol

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @officiallykeith

@officiallykeith Yes

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @765yoshi

@765yoshi None

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @lee33788

@lee33788 Probably. I've been doing planning for 72 years.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Daniel40995729

@Daniel40995729 @officiallykeith They haven't reached out to me. As far as I know.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @bitcoingirl_

@bitcoingirl_ This is a dangerous woman gentlemen. That's why I reached out to her and offered her a job. Is she brave enough to accept??? Remains to be seen.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @G_Lucas558

@G_Lucas558 No one told me. I'll randomly fire someone and the mistake won't happen again.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @earea_de

@earea_de Ok

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @jatilfrihet1

@jatilfrihet1 @Legaleagle26 Word

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Thingamajig88

@Thingamajig88 @Legaleagle26 Ty

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @RapidProtoTripe

@RapidProtoTripe @Legaleagle26 Its legally called conspiring.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@James_LoveAfter @Legaleagle26 Nit legally.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Joel_Ainsworth

@Joel_Ainsworth @Legaleagle26 Then they are involved in conspiring against Alex Jones. Penalty: ten to twenty in Federal prison.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @jmommi

@jmommi @Legaleagle26 Then they conspired. Ten to twenty in Federsl prisin.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Cuzfromthebordr

@mikel45365 @Legaleagle26 Ten to twenty in Feder prison if they conspired against Akex Jones.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @henry_young

@henry_young @Legaleagle26 Fully agreed. Cencorsjio is then impossible.

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Legaleagle26

@Legaleagle26 Co-ordination to remove content is called conspiring, no matter how you look at it. Such conspiracies bring up to twenty years in Federal prison if proven.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @user14201

@user14201 @Legaleagle26 And you dont understand that coordinated removal of content is called conspiring. Such conspiracies bring up to twenty years in Federal prison for the conspiritors.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @intmanomystery1

@intmanomystery1 @Legaleagle26 Yes, they do

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @usenterprisesD

@eisstl @Legaleagle26 Hiw about that.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @KuwabaraCrypto

@KuwabaraCrypto @Legaleagle26 A coordinated removal of content is legally called conspiring. If these companies did indeed conspire, then the directors could face up to 20 years in Federal prison.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @TAC_HAMMER

@TAC_HAMMER @Legaleagle26 I like fun times.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@_maKING_market @Legaleagle26 Then they acted jointly outside of the government. This is called conspiring. The directors of all three companies could face up to twenty years in Federal prison.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

How is everyone missing this: if the three companies that banned Alex Jones acted together to coordinate his removal, then the legal definition of that act is called "conspiring". Have we all gone mad?? Such conspiracies result in many years in Federal prison. Please God! Wake up

3,143 likes · 1,020 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Has anyone considered the absurdity of most of our laws? This one for example: "Employees must wash hands". Who, exactly. Enforces this law? And how? I would love to hear the explaination. https://t.co/QUwLddBW3H

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

369 likes · 52 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ArcherBourne

@SterlingBourne Most of these restrooms are single person restrooms. Public opinion is not involved.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@akoncloud No, all US states have laws requiring employees to wash their hands.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @AiteCoin

@AiteCoin A health code is a law.

10 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @orderstudiosllc

@orderstudiosllc In a single person restroom there is no way to know whether t bug e employee washed their hands or not.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @22deers

@22deers It is a state law in every US state.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @EatCookCryptos

@EatCookCryptos How can the supervisor enforce? Enter the restroom with each employee and watch?

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @RickDonnision

@Dickvandike213 Exactly

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@sunscorpio81 Raise hell of course

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @CommunityWhaleX

@CommunityWhaleX Conspiracies are stupid? That's a dangerous attitude.

49 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @PerriPonders

@PerriPonders Uf they coordinated, then that is conspiracy. Why is everyone ignoring this fact?

73 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @satlitedude

@SatliteDude Yes. But they are not free to conspire.

70 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @CommunityWhaleX

@CommunityWhaleX Not talking about that. I'm talking about coordinating, which is conspiring, which is illegal.

8 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @MikeWeand

@MikeWeand I'm not arguing that. I'm saying it looks like they coordinated the banning. Such coordination is conspiring, which is illegal

64 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Jimmy, showing us the true face of the Easter Bunny. https://t.co/1OjV93S7X5

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

141 likes · 12 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @CaloriesProper

@CaloriesProper Of course

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ergodlt

@cryptotraktor Lol

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ElMichaelLewis

@ElMichaelLewis @AiteCoin But how is it enforced?

0 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Matt_00000001

@Mateo_Official Do they burst into the locked bathroom and check?

1 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @PerriPonders

@PerriPonders Conspiracy is illegal no matter what.

25 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DnlKlr

@DnlKlr @SatliteDude Setting a price for goods or services is not illegal, but if two or more companies get together and set prices, then they committed a major felony. They conspired to set prices. Please people!! An act may be legal acting alone, but companies get together and agree its conspiracy

69 likes · 10 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Do you all know what a "conspiracy" is? Example: It is legal to charge whatever you want for goods and services. However, if two or more companies get together and agree on pricing, then they have committed a major felony: conspiracy to fix prices. Same with banning Alex Jones.

876 likes · 224 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @__MrAnderson___

@Mr_Anderson____ Looks to me like his conspiracy theories were correct. It sure looks like these three giants conspired against him.

8 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @__MrAnderson___

@Mr_Anderson____ Good point

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DroughtHustla

@DroughtHustla Me too. There are conspiracies everywhere these days.

6 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @LawyerJerry_

@jeremyg55 Private actors may set prices, but they cannot collectively discuss prices. What is the fucking difference?

15 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DroughtHustla

@DroughtHustla It's frightening isn't it? When I imply that Apple, Facebook and Youtube committed conspiracy in banning Alex, people call me an idiot. Yet it is fairly clear that they did, there by proving part of Akex's claims. What can you do when people look at plain truth and ignore it?

24 likes · 6 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@scvfx @jeremyg55 On the fact that all three companies chose the same day, and virtually the same hour to ban him. Statistically, this is virtually impossible unless there were conversations among them.

20 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @ChrisValence

@ChrisValence True

6 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @pouchedfox

@pouchedfox Conspiracy!! Please God get a fucking clue!!! Companies may not collectively agree on any course of action whatsoever. Think of the fucking mess this world would be in if they were allowed to do so!! Please!!! Wake up!!!

8 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @jawsomejones

@jawsomejones Collusion to limit free speech is also against the law, irrespective of the validity of limiting such speech as measured by each company acting alone.

8 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @J_TheHoff

@J_TheHoff @DroughtHustla So ... conspiracy is not a crime then? Please God, get real.

12 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @J_TheHoff

@J_TheHoff @DroughtHustla Yes, I'm afraid it is. If you are a corporate entity the rules of play are very different than for individuals.

12 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @J_TheHoff

@J_TheHoff @DroughtHustla Here is the problem: collective actions by large organizations are viewed as monopolistic actions. It does not matter what the action is, if it can be viewed as monopolistic, then serious repercussions are coming.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

So I flew from the Outer Banks to Nashville, spent the night, and drove to Lexington, where I spoke to the Rotary Club. I agreed to do this before we moved to North Carolina, but a commitment is a commitment. Here I am. https://t.co/qy55OGt8S5

Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.

421 likes · 38 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Artzeechris

@ArtzeeChris I believe so

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Dave407inUSA

@Dave407inUSA Yes

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Are your coins secure on BitFi? Absolutely!! For weeks we have offered hackers the opportunity to get our wallet pre-loaded with Bitcoins. If they can take them we will pay them $250,000. No one has done that. It's a simple challenge. Your coins are safe. https://t.co/mbB2aqbgog

246 likes · 56 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Decentralized exchanges are about to become a reality. I believe the first truly functional decentralized exchange will come from Luxcore. https://t.co/Wm6pKw0REt

616 likes · 189 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @GIANYCoin

@GIA29768627 If you break the device, then get a new one. Your passphrase will recover your coins.

4 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @vladysito_07

@vladysito_07 No.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @RealShillGates

@RealShillGates Lol

7 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @RealMattCalvin

@realmattcalvin True

6 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @EnzOnCrypto

@EnzOnInfoSec You got root access by having the device in your hands. How do you steal the device from the user. Hack it and get it back into the users hands? You cant get remote root access.

6 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Excellent article on BitFi. It explains: "Interestingly, despite several claims for hacks, none of the hackers has claimed to take away the bitcoins yet. Considering this aspect, one can believe BitFi’s claim to be unhackable." https://t.co/pAz7cOJrqn

130 likes · 29 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @KickWebDesign

@KickWebDesign I have yet to see a decenttalized exchange which mirrors the functionality of the centralized exchanges. I believe LuxCore will deliver the first one.

20 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗

The last minute and a half of this video are like nothing I have ever heard. Jeff Buckly sings his heart out. Even the producer in the studio can be heard exclaiming 'Wow" at the end. Jeff Buckley - Hallelujah (Official Video) https://t.co/nNfDP9t0Sy via @YouTube

240 likes · 28 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @R3al_Finn

@R3al_Finn @YouTube Welcome

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @fvnslifestyle

@fvnslifestyle @YouTube Welcome

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @CaseyAymes

@CaseyAymes @TheCryptoGent @YouTube Powerful

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @faithsloan

@faithsloan @YouTube Awe inspiring

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @thewilliamlehr

@thewilliamlehr @YouTube Agreed

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@CAK41531917 @YouTube Welcome

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Stakeoftheart

@Stakeoftheart @YouTube I know

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @calicryptobetty

@laurazblack @YouTube Agreed

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @buzzskill_2000

@buzzskill_2000 @YouTube Me too

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @cacarr1

@cacarr1 @YouTube Good description

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Krogdog101

@Krogdog101 @YouTube Agreed

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Michaellilibeth

@Michaellilibeth @YouTube Ty

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@paul_curry @YouTube Yes

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @Malcolm84387836

@Malcolm84387836 @YouTube :)

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

Fully functional decentralized exchanges are critical to the future of crypto https://t.co/GUzmMfHlqz

498 likes · 167 reposts at capture Original source ↗

You dont want to miss this debate about the future of Bitcoin. https://t.co/F6rukiUiMB

312 likes · 109 reposts at capture Original source ↗