@SirZeus5 Yes. Absolutely.
THE PUBLIC RECORD · TEXT EDITION
The McAfee Archive
His words. Their context. Search the record.
62,567 archived tweets · 2012-11-22 to 2021-06-18 · an incomplete historical collection, not an AI recreation.
62,567 results
Historical statements may be offensive, disputed or inaccurate. Replies and quoted posts can lack surrounding context.
@whotookmaname Pharmaceutical companies, mask makers and the Mainstream Media.
@DrAnthonyFouci Yes
@maxmayur09 Storm???? Lol. If the Stanford and Oxford studies are correct ... the death rate for Covid-19 is less than the flu ... which killed 630,000 last year. Look it up. Covid has only killed 200,000 this season. It will be back in the fall.
@TheMaxMalkov I have every idea.
@Trem_wT Scam. Ignore.
@FRANCOCHARTS Lmfao.
An Oxford University study: https://t.co/kjolsj0OpE Mirrored Stanford's study: Half of our population Is already infected, making lockdown the most ridiculous event of the past 200 years! Except NYC, where hospitals are taking advantage of the $39,000 per diagnosed patient:) https://t.co/loIwopTojb
Media was attached; images and videos are not mirrored in this edition.
@7Lowe England did random testing three weeks ago. 150,000 tested. 20% positive.
@IssueJab Africa has the lowest rate if death in the World!!!!!!!!!!! Source: https://t.co/nKAMCaooDf
@VictoryWaits Corporations cannot gain credit as early as the next three weeks. Sorry to disagree
@shoshanazuboff Is there any way you could open your DMs for me? I am the founder of MAfee Anti-Virus.
@DukeJupiter1 @Welcomecoin2017 3,200,000 tested positive 230,000 deaths Rate calculated from tested numbers = 6% 1% of population tested. True death rate=0.06%
@JD_Hoy We're dealing with differences so fast, that even if one half of the tests were unreliable, it makes little difference in the outcome. Does no-one study math anymore????
@Posh_Jim I'm using numbers directly from testing countries. England, for example, RANDOMLY tested 150,000 people. 21% were found to be infected. Look up England's population and deaths from the virus. Truth only comes by doing the work of finding it yourself.
@Chrost_ :)
@FredBrooker Yes they do. They use the same method of extrapolation - do a few random tests around the world and extrapolate. That's how math works.
@Welcomecoin2017 No it's far less than that.
@henritzu Elon agrees with me completely.
@yalvaret98 No, but a million times better than iOs.
@JohnPaulFontan3 Mute me or block me. It will get worse. Is a simple push of a button, so back off!
@TheRealRichL124 No, my friend.. the reverse is true.
If 1% of the Word's general population has been tested and a number - "X" were infected, then the likely REAL number of infections is 100 times X. Death rate is is determined by dividing deaths by total infections. Thus the death rate is 100 times less. Math folks- help me out
Authorities doubt studies showing Covid-19 has infected many more than the reported numbers from testing show - making its death rate less then the flu. But the studies are correct. Let's use math: Fewer than 1% of the world population has been tested. Extrapolate the numbers
@OBalbriggan No. They have tested millions for Covid, but still a tiny fraction of the world population.