◇ 0xNull

THE PUBLIC RECORD · TEXT EDITION

The McAfee Archive

His words. Their context. Search the record.

62,567 archived tweets · 2012-11-22 to 2021-06-18 · an incomplete historical collection, not an AI recreation.

Words match together; use quotation marks for phrases or OR for alternatives. Topic shortcuts use keyword matches, not editorial judgements. Clear filters

62,567 results

Historical statements may be offensive, disputed or inaccurate. Replies and quoted posts can lack surrounding context.

Reply to @KtcClarence

@KtcClarence Proof: https://t.co/NRzR1lL0WV

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @dh_wil

@dh_wil Here is the proof: https://t.co/NRzR1lL0WV

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @damned_liar

@jpars193 Here is verification: https://t.co/NRzR1lL0WV

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @maxxrpbtc

@maxxrpbtc @squirrelmaker Thank you. Rather than believe people who analyse pixels, they believe their own reasoning is more valid then their eyes.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @dh_wil

@dh_wil No. Video analysts have verified it.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@squirrelmaker I don't.

0 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @_EmilioLion

@_EmilioLion No clue. Sent to me anonymously. It has been authenticated however.

4 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DrAnthonyFouci

@DrAnthonyFouci No. But my analysts have authenticated it. Any specialist will.

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@dyingwasp :)

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@Lrn_To_Read_RTL No clue

6 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@hueydevlin1 No clue. It was sent to me anonymously. It's authentic.

2 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @DrAnthonyFouci

@DrAnthonyFouci It's not horseshit. It's authentic. It was sent to me.

3 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @G1NCHY

@G1NCHY Nothing. Crime will always be with us.

18 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @aslomaty

@aslomaty That's why I want a gun.

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @TronBloke

@TronBloke Word.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @TruthRaiderHQ

@TruthRaiderHQ Love it.

17 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @crickywilson

@crickywilson Lmfao!!!

7 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @PLUTOAPLANET

@PLUTOAPLANET Guns exist everywhere. Corrupt soldiers sell them, people steal them from gun manufacturers. But that's a moot point. You can build one yourself now with 3D printers. It's trivial. Thousands are doing it. Gonna ban 3D printers too. How about "Zip Guns" made from pipes?

16 likes · 2 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @traderfelix

@traderfelix Argue this with your fellow Brit. https://t.co/4dO8zUPeZk

1 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗

@hueydevlin1 No they wouldn't!!!!!! They couldn't have guns. It would be against the law. Wake up.

10 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @matt67SC

@drainomoreno Clearly not to you. Go back to sleep. Nothing to see here.

4 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @bob11988

@bob11988 Few got it. I don't want to be seen as anti-firearm.

13 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @PhiteOnn

@PhiteOnn Yes. Something happened.

5 likes · 0 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @officialmcafee

My humor is obviously to dry for folks. Reason this through: Outlaws are, by definition, people who pay no attention to laws. Outlawing guns would have no impact whatsoever on them. The only people able to own guns, therefore, would be outlaws. Am I getting through???

1,007 likes · 79 reposts at capture Original source ↗
Reply to @JAGanzy

@jamcgaughan Outlaws, by definition ... pay no attention to laws.

18 likes · 1 reposts at capture Original source ↗