@JLRpatriot Word
THE PUBLIC RECORD · TEXT EDITION
The McAfee Archive
His words. Their context. Search the record.
62,567 archived tweets · 2012-11-22 to 2021-06-18 · an incomplete historical collection, not an AI recreation.
62,567 results
Historical statements may be offensive, disputed or inaccurate. Replies and quoted posts can lack surrounding context.
@CaliAnonymt Google it
Almost all CV deaths were elderly or critically ill - those who had lived a long life, or those who were children of misfortune. For many, each new day was a lucky day. Along comes a cold, or the flu or Covid-19. Can we blame these exit attendants of life, for their deaths?
@DudeItsJman Me neither. However... I keep my finger on the pulse of many things. Jungwoo's defeat will go down in History - magnificent in its depth ... and his face and demeanor define defeat better than any ten second demonstration I have seen.
@ITalkcric @jack Yes. But fact by committe consensus is madness.
@ITalkcric @jack Yes. But it is the best we have. When facts are proven by committee there is nothing but opinion.
@PrinceOfYen @buzz339 @jack 1 plus 1 is 2. That's how.
@ITalkcric @jack Nonsense. That's a theory. A fact is a demonstrable, repeatable demonstration explained mathematically.
@alshadwisa @jack Lol
@ApophasisWonder @jack I apologize
@intelektor @jack Yes. And they're based on math, which follows fixed laws. There are no known facts outside of this realm.
@polycultic @jack Google it
@am_jeds @jack Crazy according to who?
@johndrew_EX @jack Morning
@dcg00n3r @buzz339 @jack Exactly!
@buzz339 @jack Thank God mathematics is not ruled by the majority. Nor science. Nor the building of bridges. We would all be dead.
Twitter is fact checking. What's a fact? Your perception of reality or mine? @jack
@wmsglobetrotter @jack It's a warning that the tweet glorifies violence. I have no interest in reading such a tweet. Few would. But the truth is, if you want to put a warning, it should be: "The most powerful man in the world is threatening to kill you" I damn sure would want to read that tweet.
@mbs_ctt @jack Word
@Stevie_oneduhh @jack Does the source matter? I just want to know whether someone is going to shoot at me. I don't give a flying fuck why.
@RosaTron @jack The former would not scare me. The latter would. I damn sure would want to hear the latter if that was what was threatened.
@MollyJongFast @williamlegate @jack I'm glad you are sure of that and you can act according to your belief. I prefer to take no risks when a powerful person with nearly unlimited force threatens me. Perhaps I'm a fool.
@williamlegate @jack Not as I see it. A warning that a tweet "glorifies" violence is a tweet I don't want to look at. A warning saying "this man my send his forces to kill you" is a tweet I damn sure want to read.
To @jack: If threats of violence are deemed "Glorification", then we are in serious trouble. Would it not be better for everyone to know that the man in charge of our armed forces is threatening action, than to keep us all in the dark?
@dilliard_ed Well ... It should be fun.